Kidney

Kidney Stone: Will It Pass on Its Own or Do I Need Surgery?

A decision-navigator guide to kidney and ureteral stones: how size, location, obstruction, hydronephrosis, and infection shape the choice between observation, ESWL, RIRS, and PCNL — without a single millimeter-based rule.

Άνδρας με νεφρικό κολικό και ανατομική απεικόνιση λίθου νεφρού και ουρητήρα με τις επιλογές θεραπείας ESWL, RIRS και PCNL
Medically reviewed by Dr. Marinos VasilasPublished: September 202620 min read

▶ Quick Answer

There is no single "correct" size rule that determines whether a kidney or ureteral stone will pass on its own or require surgery. The decision usually weighs size, location, whether there is obstruction or hydronephrosis, whether infection or fever is present, and the intensity of symptoms. Small, non-obstructing stones in the lower ureter often have a good chance of spontaneous passage, while larger or obstructing stones — especially with infection — usually lead to active treatment (ESWL, RIRS, or PCNL). The guide below explains how these factors combine — it does not replace individualized medical evaluation.

Medical Review

Dr. Marinos Vasilas - Urologist Rhodes

Dr. Marinos Vasilas, Urologist - Andrologist

Urologist specializing in robotic and laparoscopic urological surgery.

Kidney Stone or Ureteral Stone: Why Location Changes Everything

Anatomical illustration of kidney/ureteral stone location, size, and treatment options (ESWL, laser, PCNL)

A "kidney stone" (kidney stones / nephrolithiasis) and a "ureteral stone" (ureteral stones) often describe the same original problem at a different stage: the stone forms inside the kidney and, if it moves, travels a specific path before reaching the bladder.

  • Renal pelvis → ureteropelvic junction (the narrowest point near the kidney)
  • Upper ureter (at the level of the iliac vessels)
  • Mid-ureter
  • Lower ureter → ureterovesical junction (the narrowest point along the entire path) → bladder

The stone's location along this path — not just its size — significantly affects the likelihood of spontaneous passage and the type of treatment usually discussed.

The 5-Step Decision Navigator

Before any discussion of ESWL, RIRS, or PCNL, a urologist typically examines five key factors, not a single millimeter figure:

  • Stone size — measured on CT, not ultrasound
  • Location — kidney, upper/mid/lower ureter
  • Obstruction or hydronephrosis — whether urine flow is blocked
  • Infection or fever — whether a urinary tract infection is present
  • Symptom intensity — pain, hematuria, impact on daily life

These five factors combine with one another — they don't work in isolation. Their combination, not a single criterion, determines whether observation or active treatment is recommended. The final decision is always individualized by your treating urologist after reviewing your imaging and clinical picture.

Stone Size: What the Data Generally Show

EAU guidelines describe general trends in spontaneous passage likelihood by size, without this being an absolute rule for every patient:

  • ≤4-5 mm: relatively high likelihood of spontaneous passage, especially for lower-ureter stones
  • 5-7 mm: moderate likelihood of spontaneous passage; a period of observation is often discussed
  • 8-10 mm: reduced likelihood of spontaneous passage; active treatment is discussed more often
  • 10-20 mm: active treatment (ESWL, RIRS, or PCNL depending on location/composition) is discussed in most cases
  • >20 mm: PCNL is discussed more often as a first option, especially for kidney stones

These ranges are general trends from the literature, not automatic decision cutoffs — location, stone composition, and the presence of obstruction or infection can change the discussion entirely, even for the same size.

Can a 4–5 mm Ureteral Stone Pass on Its Own?

Stones up to 4-5 mm, especially in the lower ureter, have a relatively favorable likelihood of spontaneous passage according to systematic reviews of the international literature. This does not mean every such stone will pass without intervention, nor that it needs no monitoring: the expected passage time can take several weeks, and the course is usually monitored with imaging and symptom checks. If fever, uncontrolled pain, or worsening hydronephrosis develops in the meantime, the picture changes and more immediate treatment is often needed, regardless of the initial size.

What Is Usually True for a 6–7 mm Stone?

In the 6-7 mm range, the likelihood of spontaneous passage decreases compared to smaller stones, but does not disappear — especially if the stone is in the lower ureter and is not causing significant obstruction. In this range, a limited period of observation with medical expulsive therapy is often discussed before considering active treatment such as RIRS or ESWL. The decision also depends on how long the stone has remained in the same position, pain intensity, and whether kidney function is affected.

Does an 8–10 mm Stone Always Mean Surgery?

Not always, but in this range active treatment is discussed more often than for smaller stones. Stones of 8-10 mm have a lower average likelihood of spontaneous passage, especially if located in the upper or mid-ureter or accompanied by persistent hydronephrosis. In these cases, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or flexible ureteroscopy with laser (RIRS) are usually considered, depending on location, stone composition, and its density on CT. A single, non-obstructing 8 mm stone in a favorable location can still be observed for a short period, depending on the clinical picture.

A 1–2 cm Stone Inside the Kidney: What Changes

For stones of 10-20 mm located inside the kidney, spontaneous passage is not a realistic expectation in most cases — the stone is simply too large to pass through the normal ureteral diameter without fragmentation. The treatment discussion usually revolves around ESWL or RIRS, with the choice influenced by the location inside the kidney (e.g., lower pole calyx), the stone's density in Hounsfield Units, and the anatomy of the collecting system. Lower-pole stones are generally considered more difficult both for spontaneous passage and for complete clearance after ESWL, due to the direction of gravity.

Above 2 cm: Why PCNL Is Usually Discussed

For stones larger than 20 mm, especially complex or branching (staghorn) stones, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is discussed more often as a first option in international guidelines, as it allows removal of a large stone burden in a single session, with higher complete-clearance rates compared to ESWL for this size. This does not rule out alternative techniques in selected cases (e.g., staged RIRS over multiple sessions), but PCNL remains the most commonly discussed option for a large kidney stone burden.

Why Stone Location Matters as Much as Size

Two stones of the same size can have entirely different courses depending on their location:

  • Lower-ureter stones: generally the most favorable location for spontaneous passage
  • Mid-ureter stones: intermediate likelihood, influenced by proximity to the iliac vessels
  • Upper-ureter stones: may be associated with more pronounced hydronephrosis if they cause obstruction
  • Renal pelvis or lower-pole calyx stones: don't "pass" in the same sense while they remain inside the kidney — the discussion is whether active removal is needed at all

This is why a question like "will my 8 mm stone pass on its own?" doesn't have a single answer without knowing exactly where it is.

Two 10 mm Stones Are Not the Same Problem

An example that shows why size alone is not enough: Stone A is 10 mm, located in the lower ureter, causes no obstruction, there is no fever, and kidney function is normal — in this case a period of observation may be discussed. Stone B is also 10 mm, but is located at the ureteropelvic junction, causes moderate hydronephrosis, and the patient has a mild fever — this picture leads to more immediate evaluation and likely active treatment. The same number in millimeters, two entirely different clinical decisions — which is why CT imaging and clinical examination, not size alone, determine the next step.

When We Do NOT Wait: Red Flags Requiring Immediate Evaluation

Regardless of stone size, the findings below are a reason for immediate — not scheduled — medical evaluation:

  • Fever or chills alongside renal colic
  • Uncontrolled pain that does not respond to analgesics
  • Persistent vomiting with inability to keep down fluids
  • Stone in a solitary kidney (a single functioning kidney)
  • Significant decrease in urine output or anuria
  • Pregnancy with suspected renal colic

These findings, especially the combination of fever with obstruction, are considered a urological emergency and are not managed with simple observation at home.

Obstruction with Infection: Why It Is an Emergency and What Follows

An obstructed and infected kidney (obstructive pyelonephritis) is considered a urological emergency, regardless of the size of the stone causing the obstruction. The immediate priority is not definitive stone removal, but decompression of the system, usually with ureteral stent placement or nephrostomy, together with intravenous antibiotics. According to EAU guidelines, these two decompression methods are generally considered equally effective as an immediate measure. Definitive stone treatment (ESWL, RIRS, or PCNL) is scheduled at a later stage, once the infection has resolved. Related content: Pyelonephritis.

When Is Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Discussed?

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) using shock waves to fragment kidney stones

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) uses shock waves from outside the body to fragment a stone into smaller pieces that can pass naturally. It is discussed more often for small-to-medium stones, especially when stone density on CT (Hounsfield Units) and skin-to-stone distance are favorable. It does not require incisions or general anesthesia in most cases, but may need more than one session, and fragments take time to pass after the session.

When Is RIRS / Flexible Laser Ureteroscopy Discussed?

High-power laser kidney stone lithotripsy (RIRS) fragmenting a kidney stone

Retrograde intrarenal surgery with laser (RIRS) enters through the natural pathways (urethra → bladder → ureter → kidney) with a flexible endoscope, without an external incision, fragmenting the stone with a high-power laser under direct vision. It is often discussed for medium-sized stones in the ureter or kidney, especially when precise, direct visual control of the stone's location is needed. It usually requires placement of a temporary ureteral stent afterward and may need a second session for a larger stone burden.

When Is Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Needed?

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for removal of large kidney stones

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) creates a small skin tract directly into the kidney to remove a large stone burden in a single session. It is discussed more often for stones >20 mm, branching (staghorn) stones, or when previous ESWL/RIRS attempts were not fully effective. It usually requires a short hospital stay and general anesthesia, but offers the highest single-session complete-clearance rates for a large stone burden, according to international guidelines.

ESWL, RIRS, and PCNL: A Neutral Comparison

Comparison of the three kidney stone treatment techniques: ESWL, laser RIRS, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

These three techniques don't compete in a "better versus worse" sense — each fits a different stone profile, location, and patient. The comparison below presents key characteristics neutrally, without ranking or a recommendation.

ESWL

Non-invasive, no incisions. Better results for smaller, lower-density stones. May require multiple sessions. Fragments pass gradually after the session.

RIRS (Flexible Laser Ureteroscopy)

No external incision, through natural pathways. Direct visual contact with the stone. Usually requires a temporary ureteral stent. Suitable for medium-sized kidney or ureteral stones.

PCNL

Small skin tract directly into the kidney. Higher single-session complete-clearance rates for a large stone burden. Requires a short hospital stay and general anesthesia.

What CT Imaging Tells Us and What Hounsfield Units Mean

Kidney stone assessment with CT imaging, showing Hounsfield unit density and size measurement

Non-contrast CT urography is the primary imaging test for precisely characterizing a stone, as it provides information not equally visible on ultrasound:

  • Precise size in three dimensions
  • Exact location within the urinary tract
  • Density in Hounsfield Units (HU) — an indicator of stone hardness
  • Skin-to-stone distance, relevant to the likelihood of ESWL success
  • Presence and degree of hydronephrosis
  • Number of stones and total stone burden

Stones with higher Hounsfield Unit density tend to respond less well to ESWL, according to systematic reviews of the literature — this is one reason technique selection is based on CT findings, not size alone.

I Have an Asymptomatic Stone: Does It Always Need to Be Removed?

Not necessarily. Small, asymptomatic stones found incidentally (e.g., on imaging for another reason) that are not causing obstruction or hydronephrosis can often be monitored periodically rather than removed immediately. The decision depends on size, location, growth trend on serial imaging, and the patient's personal stone-forming history. Asymptomatic stones inside the kidney that remain stable may only need periodic reassessment, while an increase in size or the onset of symptoms changes the discussion.

Is There a Medication That Helps a Stone Pass? (Medical Expulsive Therapy)

Medical expulsive therapy (MET), usually with alpha-blockers, is used in selected cases to facilitate spontaneous passage of ureteral stones during the observation period. Recent revisions of the EAU guidelines have updated the recommendations on MET, and its use is individualized based on stone size and location. It does not replace the need for monitoring, and it is not a guarantee of passage — it is a supplementary measure discussed within the overall observation strategy.

Four Illustrative Patient Examples

The examples below are purely educational and do not correspond to a specific patient, nor are they a self-diagnosis guide:

  • Example 1: A 4 mm stone in the lower ureter, no fever, mild pain — a period of observation with MET is often discussed.
  • Example 2: A 9 mm stone in the mid-ureter with moderate hydronephrosis — active treatment (ESWL or RIRS) is often discussed.
  • Example 3: A 25 mm stone inside the kidney, asymptomatic and found incidentally — PCNL is often discussed due to size, regardless of symptoms.
  • Example 4: A 6 mm stone at the ureteropelvic junction with a fever of 38.5°C — a urological emergency, with immediate decompression as the priority, not definitive stone treatment.

Every real case is evaluated individually by the treating urologist, based on the full clinical picture and imaging.

Stone Investigation and Treatment in Rhodes

At Dr. Marinos Vasilas's urology practice in Rhodes, full investigation of kidney and ureteral stones is carried out — from the initial clinical evaluation and urinalysis to CT imaging and the development of an individualized treatment plan: observation, ESWL, RIRS, or PCNL, depending on the case. Urgent cases of obstructive pyelonephritis receive immediate evaluation and decompression.

Second Opinion for a Kidney or Ureteral Stone

When multiple valid treatment options are being discussed, it is entirely reasonable to seek a second opinion before deciding, especially if your stone's size or location falls into one of the "gray zones" described above. Dr. Marinos Vasilas can review your imaging and discuss realistically with you the options that fit your specific case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sources / Guidelines

Have questions about your recovery?

Dr. Marinos Vasilas provides individualized guidance on your recovery course.